nazi hunter izO
- Posts
- 368
- Location
- Paderborn, Germany
- Joined
- 20 October 2013
Can we please, please please please, can we just revert the changes concerning server choice in gathers? People don't agree with that change, I hear complaints about it everytime I play gathers and it just takes long to agree on a server if the captains don't even communicate. The system is simple, IN THEORY... but people don't communicate AT ALL, leading to misunderstandings and suddenly mega is still on the wrong server after having waited for 15 minutes... (IT REALLY HAPPENED JUST NOW)
I just don't see the point in having to decide on the server over teamspeak, why can you not just have the system as simple as it was before? If there are problems caused by americans not voting for their own servers (which is, to be honest, their own fucking fault) you can just decide, IN TEAMSPEAK, to join an american server instead of the one that was voted for, if everyone is okay with that.
I'm so annoyed by people being too stupid to agree on a fucking server, it takes longer than 20 minutes and delays the gather more than onehit restarting his computer 20 times...
http://i.imgur.com/hr1ud2u.png
nazi hunter izO
- Posts
- 368
- Location
- Paderborn, Germany
- Joined
- 20 October 2013
it's not only me, it's every freaking captain in gathers... have you ever seen onehit talking to someone seriously? no... it's a fact that people don't decide the server like that.
It just doesn't work the way you think it can. It delays the gathers by so much on some occasions, althought it's not necessary AT ALL
Also, there are always some people that want to have a word in server decision. We all know that there are some stubborn people who want to have something to say... I personally don't care about the server I play on so I just let the others discuss...
http://i.imgur.com/hr1ud2u.png
REFORMED
- Posts
- 141
- Location
- no., Iceland
- Joined
- 17 January 2013
ENSL Gathers
courtesy by spring
http://i.imgur.com/kKULMIn.jpg
- Posts
- 20
- Location
- Europe
- Joined
- 6 October 2013
"We have created a public database of offenses (bans/warnings) players have committed. "
How long will the warning exist? How to redress an injury/warning? (serious question, pls dont think im trolling)
Tbh. when i was Captain i didnt talk to the other Captain for picking server in 90%,
i gonna try to change that. But remember just dont vote me if u dont need! :D
P.S.
Ban Bubba for killing gathers , or do something else but nobody has fun with Sentryguns and Exos
- Posts
- 131
- Location
- Germany
- Joined
- 16 November 2013
1) I never had or heard of that kind of problem before you brought it up. And I did not see many people supporting your claims that it was a valid problem. Also unnecessary interaction is in this case a bad thing: waste of time.
2) Why should it take less time with to do more? You just claim things with no basis.
3) Point being: if you need more rules for this new way, is obvious more complicated.
4) As said before, never was an issue. Especially not in a way that someone even had to think about involving an admin in the choice of a server.
Ps.: I love how we rant and below our avatar it says "Admin abuse". I should just edit your post to: Sorry, simple is always right. :D
Anyway the new system is in place, lets see if other people care enough to complain about. I got some complains in private but thats not worth much in a discussion such as this.
From my experience system like this work better with more automation because people tend to argue less with a computer then with a person.
nazi hunter izO
- Posts
- 368
- Location
- Paderborn, Germany
- Joined
- 20 October 2013
+1 @simple
You won't hear a lot of complaints lome, because people don't give a fuck or are too shy to express their disagreements with the changes. The only feedback I heard from the new system so far (and I DID play a lot of gathers recently) was negative, because it has no big advantage and some possible disadvantages.
I'm fine with testing it out a bit more if you guys want to do that so hard, but I just think it's a waste of time and, ultimately, this forum is there to GIVE feedback.... people won't be motivated to give any feedback at all if you keep going at it so negatively. So far I have only seen Sephy and you, the NEW gather admin (appointed by Sephy) support this idea.
http://i.imgur.com/hr1ud2u.png
nazi hunter izO
- Posts
- 368
- Location
- Paderborn, Germany
- Joined
- 20 October 2013
(we are the only ones that have voiced ANY feedback at all for that matter....)
http://i.imgur.com/hr1ud2u.png
Horror Show
-
- Admins
- Ref Admin
- Posts
- 105
- Location
- Omsk (Siberia), Russian Federation
- Joined
- 3 December 2012
I am agree with simple here because his arguments seems to me only reasonable
Battle.net: CRaZyCAT #222106
thanks for your feedback about that feature, i will setup a poll, very soonly, so you can vote, if you want us to revert back to the multiserver's voting system :)
It was a test in first place, so we might change the format again (& again & again)
Alski Syndrome
- Posts
- 183
- Location
- United States of America
- Joined
- 29 June 2014
Ideally it would be nice to have 2 rounds of voting, so like first vote EU/NA then second vote is a list of servers only from the winning location. That or having the server list generated automatically based of location of players in gather. Problem with that is people use troll flags. Both things would require coding though :/
I like this new system because every gather I've played in so far hasn't been on a bad server like Vienna. Usually it's London, NA East or TF. Sometimes with the old system you'd get people splitting their votes so a server with 3 votes out of 12 may win because people decided to fuck around with their server choices then we get stuck on a shitty server. Maybe another option would be to prune the bad servers from the list?
- Posts
- 20
- Location
- Europe
- Joined
- 6 October 2013
honestly u like that cause u are american and dont know how to vote NA servers
LMAO gotcha
- Posts
- 57
- Location
- Tuvalu
- Joined
- 31 January 2014
I want the old system back, this new system causes arguments 24/7, it's shit.
- Posts
- 104
- Location
- France
- Joined
- 9 March 2014
I don't give a sh*t about this change.
And I think that people are not talking or giving feedback about this small change cause it's not really a problem, nothing have really changed, no one cares.
nazi hunter izO
- Posts
- 368
- Location
- Paderborn, Germany
- Joined
- 20 October 2013
Says the guy that doesn't play ns2
in my opinion this feedback is more than enough to revert the changes, the only people not agreeing with them are those that don't notice the problems it causes
http://i.imgur.com/hr1ud2u.png
nazi hunter izO
- Posts
- 368
- Location
- Paderborn, Germany
- Joined
- 20 October 2013
Because they don't play gathers, not because they have another opinion
http://i.imgur.com/hr1ud2u.png
- Posts
- 104
- Location
- France
- Joined
- 9 March 2014
Wtf Buer :( I keep playing on gathers, but I don't see where is the problem.
Voting for a specific server or for an EU or NA random server is the SAME.
And I NEVER had any troubles playing on a nsl server. The lag/shitreg is a myth, git gud before shitting pls. ;>
